Page 1 of 1

Scars On Broadway

Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 8:48 am
by Bobbyjames
new band from a couple of members of System Of A Down. bought the album the other day. its awesome. if any of you guys are fans of SOAD, you'll love this album.

http://www.myspace.com/scarsonbroadway

Re: Scars On Broadway

Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 8:56 pm
by Hentaiman
Yeah their album is kickass!

Re: Scars On Broadway

Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 3:48 am
by DJChaos182
awesome band. my favourite song is probably Exploding/Reloading or They Say

Re: Scars On Broadway

Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 6:19 am
by LTS
yeah; i'm amazed at how simple there guitar parts are... this is the SOAD guitarist right?
i can play like half of there songs and i am the sux at guitar

Re: Scars On Broadway

Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 8:18 am
by Bobbyjames
yea, the guitarist with the cool voice, Daron Malakian or something like that lol. i love Chemicals as well, well funny

Re: Scars On Broadway

Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 5:02 pm
by LTS
i just took another listen to the album; and i'm surprised at how well the critics reviewed it. Serj's solo album (which in my mind is much better than any Scars songs...) got killed by critics.

to me; this album sounds like a SOAD b-sides collection.
(which is actually a good thing)..

Re: Scars On Broadway

Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 6:54 pm
by Bobbyjames
i still can't decide as to which album i prefer. i think im gonna need to listen to this one as much as Serj's one to really make a decision

Re: Scars On Broadway

Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 9:57 pm
by Ansem
They're not bad, but I still prefer SOAD.

Re: Scars On Broadway

Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 8:42 am
by Bobbyjames
Ansem wrote:They're not bad, but I still prefer SOAD.
agreed. i hope they do come back

Re: Scars On Broadway

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 12:21 am
by domblackman
Ansem wrote:They're not bad, but I still prefer SOAD.
Yup, both projects seem to just be weaker, less good System material. Both need each other.
Saying that, I do really like this album. Serious gets a bit repetetive though.