Re: TNS Rulebook *Updated 12/10/08*
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 12:06 pm
Whatta pathetic thread.
daredbus wrote:What an uber pathetic thread.
Page 4 of 5
Re: TNS Rulebook *Updated 12/10/08*
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 4:14 pm
Re: TNS Rulebook *Updated 12/10/08*
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 5:14 pm
Dear God, this has to be the most spammed thread. (By bots!)
Re: TNS Rulebook *Updated 12/10/08*
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 6:10 am
You guys made me double post D:<
Re: TNS Rulebook *Updated 22/01/09*
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 2:47 am
New rule.
The Youtube thread one has gone - theres a new subforum in Whatever for it.
The Youtube thread one has gone - theres a new subforum in Whatever for it.
Re: TNS Rulebook *Updated 22/01/09*
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 5:58 am
Here's a suggestion
1. Ignore All rules.
But seriously what's the new rule? They look the same to me
1. Ignore All rules.
But seriously what's the new rule? They look the same to me
Re: TNS Rulebook *Updated 22/01/09*
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 3:01 pm
The new rule is: you're bant. I'm fed up of your shit posts.LTS wrote:Here's a suggestion
1. Ignore All rules.
But seriously what's the new rule? They look the same to me
The new one is the last one about sigs. It's always been an unwritten rule but it's happened several times lately
PS. Come back as a changed person
Re: TNS Rulebook *Updated 22/01/09*
Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:20 pm
lol, bans don't work...Jake! wrote:The new rule is: you're bant. I'm fed up of your shit posts.LTS wrote:Here's a suggestion
1. Ignore All rules.
But seriously what's the new rule? They look the same to me
The new one is the last one about sigs. It's always been an unwritten rule but it's happened several times lately
PS. Come back as a changed person
Re: TNS Rulebook *Updated 22/01/09*
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:23 pm
here are some rules that should be added.
1. Don't argue with a mod or admin.
2. Be positive. This is a fun community and we want to keep it a positive place.
3. Admins decisions are final.
1. Don't argue with a mod or admin.
2. Be positive. This is a fun community and we want to keep it a positive place.
3. Admins decisions are final.
Re: TNS Rulebook *Updated 22/01/09*
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:42 pm
1 = not a rule. You're welcome to argue with me all you want. You'll probably have me breathing down your neck waiting for you to fuck up even the slightest so I can give you a warning, but you can definitely argue with me.LTS wrote:here are some rules that should be added.
1. Don't argue with a mod or admin.
2. Be positive. This is a fun community and we want to keep it a positive place.
3. Admins decisions are final.
2. = only half true. Negativity should come and go. If it's a bad thing that is going on, negativity is appropriate... but if we don't do anything wrong and everything is fine... why be negative?
3. Admins don't make many mistakes. Of course admin decisions are final. That isn't even needed to be posted it's so well known.
Re: TNS Rulebook *Updated 22/01/09*
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 8:11 pm
It's safe to conclude that these rules did nothing and didn't help the forum run smoothly at all. These rules = the problem.Jordan wrote:Well, I recently was private messaging with one of our members about someone being banned, he kept asking me where in the, "TNS Rulebook" does it say that (insert broken rule here) and I was wondering, "What TNS Rulebook is this guy talking about?" So now, I have decided to write some general rules to make the forum run smoothly.
I am shocked that the mods/admins haven't figured that out yet...
If they were taken down, sure, a couple topics will be bumped just because, but it will stop. Everyone would stop their bitching if these rules weren't so strict. Look @ PD, i don't rules as strict as these...
Re: TNS Rulebook *Updated 22/01/09*
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:39 pm
The problem isn't the rules, the problem is the people who can't seem to follow these rules. In fact, these rules are pretty basic and pretty much the same on every forum that can manage to keep its head above water.Peter wrote:It's safe to conclude that these rules did nothing and didn't help the forum run smoothly at all. These rules = the problem.Jordan wrote:Well, I recently was private messaging with one of our members about someone being banned, he kept asking me where in the, "TNS Rulebook" does it say that (insert broken rule here) and I was wondering, "What TNS Rulebook is this guy talking about?" So now, I have decided to write some general rules to make the forum run smoothly.
I am shocked that the mods/admins haven't figured that out yet...
If they were taken down, sure, a couple topics will be bumped just because, but it will stop. Everyone would stop their bitching if these rules weren't so strict. Look @ PD, i don't rules as strict as these...
I don't see what's so hard about not posting in a one month old topic if you have nothing to say.
And the only people that seem to bitch are you and Luke.
Re: TNS Rulebook *Updated 22/01/09*
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 12:17 am
No, I'm stopping. Ignore that post please and thank you
Re: TNS Rulebook *Updated 22/01/09*
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 1:45 am
When we were putting together a list of rules that should be followed on this site... the main thing we based our rule systems on were the rules that PD had. We looked back on PD, along with a couple of other websites to make a list of rules that we felt fit this website. PD has a topic that shows all of the rules of the website. You can find it in the "Whatever" section, along with plenty of others I am sure. Realize that you are allowed to have your fun as long as it doesn't turn into a big spam fest or a big argument. We don't even look in the Forum Games section for the most part, but you guys don't seem to make use of your opportunities in there. If you're looking to have fun, find legal ways to do it, and stop attempting to make this place a complete anarchy. Really, no forum is going to succeed if there isn't a set of rules to follow. We have only banned like 3 members in the past year, and all 3 of which were basically anarchists... rebels without a cause. Members like Tom can easily find a way past all of this negativity and have fun on here... although he seems to post less these days... plus, I don't think it would be a stretch to say that the Chat Box is possibly the coolest little gadget that any forum has incorporated.Peter wrote: It's safe to conclude that these rules did nothing and didn't help the forum run smoothly at all. These rules = the problem.
I am shocked that the mods/admins haven't figured that out yet...
If they were taken down, sure, a couple topics will be bumped just because, but it will stop. Everyone would stop their bitching if these rules weren't so strict. Look @ PD, i don't rules as strict as these...
Re: TNS Rulebook *Updated 22/01/09*
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 2:10 am
Come on Kyle.. Read!!Peter wrote:No, I'm stopping. Ignore that post please and thank you
We need to be able to delete our own posts.
Re: TNS Rulebook *Updated 22/01/09*
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 11:30 pm
Where have i complained about the rules? my only posts in this thread are suggestions of new rules...Jeremy wrote:The problem isn't the rules, the problem is the people who can't seem to follow these rules. In fact, these rules are pretty basic and pretty much the same on every forum that can manage to keep its head above water.Peter wrote:It's safe to conclude that these rules did nothing and didn't help the forum run smoothly at all. These rules = the problem.Jordan wrote:Well, I recently was private messaging with one of our members about someone being banned, he kept asking me where in the, "TNS Rulebook" does it say that (insert broken rule here) and I was wondering, "What TNS Rulebook is this guy talking about?" So now, I have decided to write some general rules to make the forum run smoothly.
I am shocked that the mods/admins haven't figured that out yet...
If they were taken down, sure, a couple topics will be bumped just because, but it will stop. Everyone would stop their bitching if these rules weren't so strict. Look @ PD, i don't rules as strict as these...
I don't see what's so hard about not posting in a one month old topic if you have nothing to say.
And the only people that seem to bitch are you and Luke.
Re: TNS Rulebook *Updated 22/01/09*
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 11:35 pm
I talking about the thing about the bots that got you kicked out of the Underclassmen.LTS wrote:Where have i complained about the rules? my only posts in this thread are suggestions of new rules...Jeremy wrote:The problem isn't the rules, the problem is the people who can't seem to follow these rules. In fact, these rules are pretty basic and pretty much the same on every forum that can manage to keep its head above water.Peter wrote:It's safe to conclude that these rules did nothing and didn't help the forum run smoothly at all. These rules = the problem.Jordan wrote:Well, I recently was private messaging with one of our members about someone being banned, he kept asking me where in the, "TNS Rulebook" does it say that (insert broken rule here) and I was wondering, "What TNS Rulebook is this guy talking about?" So now, I have decided to write some general rules to make the forum run smoothly.
I am shocked that the mods/admins haven't figured that out yet...
If they were taken down, sure, a couple topics will be bumped just because, but it will stop. Everyone would stop their bitching if these rules weren't so strict. Look @ PD, i don't rules as strict as these...
I don't see what's so hard about not posting in a one month old topic if you have nothing to say.
And the only people that seem to bitch are you and Luke.
Re: TNS Rulebook *Updated 22/01/09*
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 11:43 pm
ah yeah...... that....Jeremy wrote:I talking about the thing about the bots that got you kicked out of the Underclassmen.LTS wrote:Where have i complained about the rules? my only posts in this thread are suggestions of new rules...Jeremy wrote:The problem isn't the rules, the problem is the people who can't seem to follow these rules. In fact, these rules are pretty basic and pretty much the same on every forum that can manage to keep its head above water.Peter wrote:It's safe to conclude that these rules did nothing and didn't help the forum run smoothly at all. These rules = the problem.Jordan wrote:Well, I recently was private messaging with one of our members about someone being banned, he kept asking me where in the, "TNS Rulebook" does it say that (insert broken rule here) and I was wondering, "What TNS Rulebook is this guy talking about?" So now, I have decided to write some general rules to make the forum run smoothly.
I am shocked that the mods/admins haven't figured that out yet...
If they were taken down, sure, a couple topics will be bumped just because, but it will stop. Everyone would stop their bitching if these rules weren't so strict. Look @ PD, i don't rules as strict as these...
I don't see what's so hard about not posting in a one month old topic if you have nothing to say.
And the only people that seem to bitch are you and Luke.
Re: TNS Rulebook *Updated 22/01/09*
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 9:31 pm
Re: TNS Rulebook *Updated 22/01/09*
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 7:53 am
