TheresNoSolution.com

Why are Sum 41 and blink so related to each other. I see that this forum site is 20 % blink. Is it because they're both punk rock? o_O

They're two sides of the same coin.

Both punk rock, partying, drinking, hotel room wrecking idiots.

Dunno, Personally, I'm not to fond of blink

both write incredibly catchy, appealling punk-rock songs that people this age grew up with. 90's and early 00's FTW 8)

2 of the best bands to ever exist.
dur

A good amount of people on this site came from Punkdisasters, a Blink-182 forum.

Sum 41 and blink-182 are NOT punk. Not not not not not.

Bullet_For_My_Valenzine wrote:They're two sides of the same coin.

Both punk rock, partying, drinking, hotel room wrecking idiots.

EXACTLY. :D

exactly! but they both rock!! 8)

Bass Cone wrote:Sum 41 and blink-182 are NOT punk. Not not not not not.

Last time I heard Pop-Punk was a form of Punk music so yeah they are

boniboyblue wrote:

Bass Cone wrote:Sum 41 and blink-182 are NOT punk. Not not not not not.

Last time I heard Pop-Punk was a form of Punk music so yeah they are

No they aren't. Pop-punk does not equal punk. Just like nu metal does not equal metal. blink-182 is pop. I wouldn't even call them pop-punk. I wouldn't call them rock. I would maybe call them pop-rock. Sum 41 is more rock/alternative. But the bottom line is-they aren't punk. Real punk is like Discharge, The Clash, Exploited, ect.

Bass Cone wrote:

boniboyblue wrote:

Bass Cone wrote:Sum 41 and blink-182 are NOT punk. Not not not not not.

Last time I heard Pop-Punk was a form of Punk music so yeah they are

No they aren't. Pop-punk does not equal punk. Just like nu metal does not equal metal. blink-182 is pop. I wouldn't even call them pop-punk. I wouldn't call them rock. I would maybe call them pop-rock. Sum 41 is more rock/alternative. But the bottom line is-they aren't punk. Real punk is like Discharge, The Clash, Exploited, ect.

I never said Punk = pop punk, I said it was a form of Punk like Nu Metal is a form of Metal. Like all music it evolves into something similar but new. Like in the 70s the Punk scene burst opened which evolved from Rock and then into the 80s/90s pop-Punk came around which was a fusion of genres.

Anyway, I'm not getting into an argument over something so childish and silly, it's my opinion and you will not change it.

I have no idea maybe it's because they sound similar( at least in the AKNF era)

ToMaTaN wrote:both write incredibly catchy, appealling punk-rock songs that people this age grew up with. 90's and early 00's FTW 8)

Yeah exactly. they both rule. Its all about the number bands.

Bass Cone wrote:

boniboyblue wrote:

Bass Cone wrote:Sum 41 and blink-182 are NOT punk. Not not not not not.

Last time I heard Pop-Punk was a form of Punk music so yeah they are

No they aren't. Pop-punk does not equal punk. Just like nu metal does not equal metal. blink-182 is pop. I wouldn't even call them pop-punk. I wouldn't call them rock. I would maybe call them pop-rock. Sum 41 is more rock/alternative. But the bottom line is-they aren't punk. Real punk is like Discharge, The Clash, Exploited, ect.

Except for those bands are all from the 80s. blink-182 and Sum 41 are the punk of this day and age. Anyone who can't handle that has some issues to deal with.

Oh please. I'm done with this forum and with Sum 41.

Shit. That's harsh. People have their own opinions on music and you give up on both the forum AND THE BAND?

Issues beyond the forum, methinks...

Don't go. :(

Bass Cone wrote:Oh please. I'm done with this forum and with Sum 41.

[/empty threat]

ToMaTaN wrote:

Bass Cone wrote:Oh please. I'm done with this forum and with Sum 41.

[/empty threat]

That made me lol.