Re: BATTLEFIELD 3
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 5:46 pm
You don't need a net connection to play the campaign...
How do you load up Battlelog without the internet?Jake wrote:You don't need a net connection to play the campaign...
I hated the way they decided to do MW3 right from day one.Gregorovich wrote:So I just watched a MW3 ad on Youtube... they're now officially self-labelling the game as 'the most anticipated game in history', which not only is arrogant, but untrue. BF3 was massively more anticipated than MW3 by critics and fans alike.
Jesus christ I fucking hate Activision. Why can't they just be more like Dice, and make decent games for enjoyment, not shite games for money. It's like the Island Def Jam thing all over again :S
Activision and Dice are not the same thing. Dice is the developer, Activision is to Infinity Ward/Treyarch/Sledgehammer/Raven What EA is to Dice, the publisher! Developers are (in most cases, Admetedly not Treyarch, they are fools) much cooler than publishers!Gregorovich wrote:So I just watched a MW3 ad on Youtube... they're now officially self-labelling the game as 'the most anticipated game in history', which not only is arrogant, but untrue. BF3 was massively more anticipated than MW3 by critics and fans alike.
Jesus christ I fucking hate Activision. Why can't they just be more like Dice, and make decent games for enjoyment, not shite games for money. It's like the Island Def Jam thing all over again :S
Yeah I meant Infinity Ward. They're both assholes.Jake wrote:Activision and Dice are not the same thing. Dice is the developer, Activision is to Infinity Ward/Treyarch/Sledgehammer/Raven What EA is to Dice, the publisher! Developers are (in most cases, Admetedly not Treyarch, they are fools) much cooler than publishers!Gregorovich wrote:So I just watched a MW3 ad on Youtube... they're now officially self-labelling the game as 'the most anticipated game in history', which not only is arrogant, but untrue. BF3 was massively more anticipated than MW3 by critics and fans alike.
Jesus christ I fucking hate Activision. Why can't they just be more like Dice, and make decent games for enjoyment, not shite games for money. It's like the Island Def Jam thing all over again :S
And EA are the biggest bunch of fucktards out there.
If you're playing in Europe online, on a console, the DICE servers are much less laggy + less disconnects than the EA ones :/Gregorovich wrote:Yeah I meant Infinity Ward. They're both assholes.Jake wrote:Activision and Dice are not the same thing. Dice is the developer, Activision is to Infinity Ward/Treyarch/Sledgehammer/Raven What EA is to Dice, the publisher! Developers are (in most cases, Admetedly not Treyarch, they are fools) much cooler than publishers!Gregorovich wrote:So I just watched a MW3 ad on Youtube... they're now officially self-labelling the game as 'the most anticipated game in history', which not only is arrogant, but untrue. BF3 was massively more anticipated than MW3 by critics and fans alike.
Jesus christ I fucking hate Activision. Why can't they just be more like Dice, and make decent games for enjoyment, not shite games for money. It's like the Island Def Jam thing all over again :S
And EA are the biggest bunch of fucktards out there.
And I get your point about EA but in this rare case I think it would be safe to say Dice are much more in control than the publishers.
Bethdeda need to learn what beta testing is. Everything they've ever released has been uber buggy.Boni Boy Blue wrote:To be fair. If I see a game developed by bioware or bethdeda. I will buy it without even looking at the publisher. I look at who develop the game.
Can't argue with that. One of my Fallout 3 saves was unfimishable. Had to start a new gameJake wrote:Bethdeda need to learn what beta testing is. Everything they've ever released has been uber buggy.Boni Boy Blue wrote:To be fair. If I see a game developed by bioware or bethdeda. I will buy it without even looking at the publisher. I look at who develop the game.