Page 2 of 2

Re: BATTLEFIELD 3

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 5:46 pm
by Jake
You don't need a net connection to play the campaign...

Re: BATTLEFIELD 3

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 5:55 pm
by Gregorovich
Jake wrote:You don't need a net connection to play the campaign...
How do you load up Battlelog without the internet?

Edit: NVM, I got it. Cheers.

Re: BATTLEFIELD 3

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 6:24 pm
by Druska
My dad is totally hooked to this game, i think he loves his xbox more than me, I saw him playing it, man the gaphics look awesome, but i'm not into war games, they're way too real for me

Re: BATTLEFIELD 3

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 8:41 pm
by Resident Skumfuk
I played this game yesterday. its completely badass. its got a few glitches in it though.

Re: BATTLEFIELD 3

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 9:03 pm
by Jake
The server browsing is a bit hit and miss at the moment... but one you're in a game, it's pretty awesome. Bullet damage seems generally low tho - Hardcore is fine, mind.

Re: BATTLEFIELD 3

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 9:22 pm
by HugoDisasters
Feels like I'm considering picking up this game once i get my paycheck :2cool4u:

Re: BATTLEFIELD 3

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 9:38 pm
by Gregorovich
When I get in a game with a really low ping, I get a K/D of usually about 2, but in a laggy server I'm lucky to get more than a few kills. Then again, that's probably because I'm playing from Orkney.

Re: BATTLEFIELD 3

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 10:22 pm
by HugoDisasters
I can't see what all complaints about Battlelog are about, i think it works fine and is a quite good concept.

Motivate perhaps?

Re: BATTLEFIELD 3

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 3:49 pm
by Gregorovich
So I just watched a MW3 ad on Youtube... they're now officially self-labelling the game as 'the most anticipated game in history', which not only is arrogant, but untrue. BF3 was massively more anticipated than MW3 by critics and fans alike.

Jesus christ I fucking hate Activision. Why can't they just be more like Dice, and make decent games for enjoyment, not shite games for money. It's like the Island Def Jam thing all over again :S

Re: BATTLEFIELD 3

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 4:37 pm
by HugoDisasters
Gregorovich wrote:So I just watched a MW3 ad on Youtube... they're now officially self-labelling the game as 'the most anticipated game in history', which not only is arrogant, but untrue. BF3 was massively more anticipated than MW3 by critics and fans alike.

Jesus christ I fucking hate Activision. Why can't they just be more like Dice, and make decent games for enjoyment, not shite games for money. It's like the Island Def Jam thing all over again :S
I hated the way they decided to do MW3 right from day one.
Activision is going for the money not quality...

Re: BATTLEFIELD 3

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 5:20 pm
by Jake
Gregorovich wrote:So I just watched a MW3 ad on Youtube... they're now officially self-labelling the game as 'the most anticipated game in history', which not only is arrogant, but untrue. BF3 was massively more anticipated than MW3 by critics and fans alike.

Jesus christ I fucking hate Activision. Why can't they just be more like Dice, and make decent games for enjoyment, not shite games for money. It's like the Island Def Jam thing all over again :S
Activision and Dice are not the same thing. Dice is the developer, Activision is to Infinity Ward/Treyarch/Sledgehammer/Raven What EA is to Dice, the publisher! Developers are (in most cases, Admetedly not Treyarch, they are fools) much cooler than publishers!

And EA are the biggest bunch of fucktards out there.

Re: BATTLEFIELD 3

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 6:00 pm
by Gregorovich
Jake wrote:
Gregorovich wrote:So I just watched a MW3 ad on Youtube... they're now officially self-labelling the game as 'the most anticipated game in history', which not only is arrogant, but untrue. BF3 was massively more anticipated than MW3 by critics and fans alike.

Jesus christ I fucking hate Activision. Why can't they just be more like Dice, and make decent games for enjoyment, not shite games for money. It's like the Island Def Jam thing all over again :S
Activision and Dice are not the same thing. Dice is the developer, Activision is to Infinity Ward/Treyarch/Sledgehammer/Raven What EA is to Dice, the publisher! Developers are (in most cases, Admetedly not Treyarch, they are fools) much cooler than publishers!

And EA are the biggest bunch of fucktards out there.
Yeah I meant Infinity Ward. They're both assholes.

And I get your point about EA but in this rare case I think it would be safe to say Dice are much more in control than the publishers.

Re: BATTLEFIELD 3

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 6:45 pm
by Jake
Gregorovich wrote:
Jake wrote:
Gregorovich wrote:So I just watched a MW3 ad on Youtube... they're now officially self-labelling the game as 'the most anticipated game in history', which not only is arrogant, but untrue. BF3 was massively more anticipated than MW3 by critics and fans alike.

Jesus christ I fucking hate Activision. Why can't they just be more like Dice, and make decent games for enjoyment, not shite games for money. It's like the Island Def Jam thing all over again :S
Activision and Dice are not the same thing. Dice is the developer, Activision is to Infinity Ward/Treyarch/Sledgehammer/Raven What EA is to Dice, the publisher! Developers are (in most cases, Admetedly not Treyarch, they are fools) much cooler than publishers!

And EA are the biggest bunch of fucktards out there.
Yeah I meant Infinity Ward. They're both assholes.

And I get your point about EA but in this rare case I think it would be safe to say Dice are much more in control than the publishers.
If you're playing in Europe online, on a console, the DICE servers are much less laggy + less disconnects than the EA ones :/

Re: BATTLEFIELD 3

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 7:50 pm
by Boni
To be fair. If I see a game developed by bioware or bethdeda. I will buy it without even looking at the publisher. I look at who develop the game.

Re: BATTLEFIELD 3

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 8:21 pm
by Jake
Boni Boy Blue wrote:To be fair. If I see a game developed by bioware or bethdeda. I will buy it without even looking at the publisher. I look at who develop the game.
Bethdeda need to learn what beta testing is. Everything they've ever released has been uber buggy.

Re: BATTLEFIELD 3

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 10:39 pm
by Boni
Jake wrote:
Boni Boy Blue wrote:To be fair. If I see a game developed by bioware or bethdeda. I will buy it without even looking at the publisher. I look at who develop the game.
Bethdeda need to learn what beta testing is. Everything they've ever released has been uber buggy.
Can't argue with that. One of my Fallout 3 saves was unfimishable. Had to start a new game