Re: Seriously, Deryck?
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 11:15 pm
rockSchmiznatch wrote:what they are all about
rockSchmiznatch wrote:what they are all about
What I mean was the live shows were more entertaining when Deryck did them drunk because he was more spontaneous and the banter wasn't scripted and reused from show to show.Schmiznatch wrote:Pretty much. I personally don't do drugs, I experienced them with zero benefit to my life and while I admit that my favorite album is, "Does This Look Infected?" I don't think it's fair to say that he was more entertaining on drugs. Mainly because at that point what do you really find entertaining? You're gaining enjoyment from the drugs affecting his brain than the actual person. I'm glad they aren't being immature little brats anymore, because I feel that the fans will get a feel for the artist and what they are all about/what they want to say with their art. Honestly, removing any lyrical hints, if you compare their albums they all contain vintage Sum 41 elements and writing styles; the older songs may have been written as a result of drugs, but they weren't like tripping acid as they wrote the riffs...c'mon.Jake-41 wrote:He was more entertaining and fun to watch back then, haha.Gunner wrote:I don't know, but he was definitely more entertaining and more fun to watch.Jake-41 wrote:So, he's like those people that drive better when they're intoxicated, except instead of driving, he's playing guitar.
And they say don't do drugs, haha.
And they probably don't do drugs anymore. All these drug stories were over five years ago. I doubt they're still doing cocaine, shrooms and acid now that they're married. Deryck, maybe now that he's unshackled. But most likely not.
Is it bad to wish he'd get back on em?
...I'm kidding of course.