Page 3 of 3
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 4:32 pm
by Phili
Steve's definitely a better rapper than Dave to me.
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:08 pm
by Schmiznatch
So far, from what I've read, a lot of people hate or at least are severely disappointed with the guitars on UH. Which, i suppose i can understand. Guitars have never really popped out at me, besides like The Bitter End or In Too Deep, I've always been more absorbed into the lyrics, melody, and flow of their albums. The only thing i see on the actual instrumental side of things. Is that whatever UH misses in guitars, makes up for it in other, new instruments. The deafening, pounding of the keyboard in CYLB, the fade in vocals and layering guitars in SPOTD, the heavier-acoustic themed songs, and of course the screams and wails of the guitars and voices constantly being wrapped around your headphones, with advanced fades and intros that have until now never been as top-notch. So, maybe in the traditional mentality of the guitar UH is missing something, but i wouldn't trade wailing 30 second solos for the professional work and effort Deryck put in this album.
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 7:16 pm
by Jeremy Kill
Yeah, I can understand what you mean because I see it that way too. There is a lot more effort put into the craft of these songs. I, myself, didn't really notice instraments in songs until Still Waiting and Over My Head. It was mainly about the melody to me, which is probably why I avoided rap and didn't like Sum 41 initially.
I also don't think Sum 41 needs wailing solos to make great songs. No Reason is my favorite Sum 41 song and it has no solo. Basically when I said "more guitar" I guess I meant variation. I know the album is supposed to have one main theme from track one to fourteen, but I personally don't think the songs all have to be similar in some way to portray that. Because then it's the music that's similar as well, not just the theme and some reviews of Underclass Hero criticize that part of the album.
^I hope that made sense.
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 7:19 pm
by Tiny *[Banned]*
Gunner wrote:Yeah, I can understand what you mean because I see it that way too. There is a lot more effort put into the craft of these songs. I, myself, didn't really notice instraments in songs until Still Waiting and Over My Head. It was mainly about the melody to me, which is probably why I avoided rap and didn't like Sum 41 initially.
I also don't think Sum 41 needs wailing solos to make great songs. No Reason is my favorite Sum 41 song and it has no solo. Basically when I said "more guitar" I guess I meant variation. I know the album is supposed to have one main theme from track one to fourteen, but I personally don't think the songs all have to be similar in some way to portray that. Because then it's the music that's similar as well, not just the theme and some reviews of Underclass Hero criticize that part of the album.
^I hope that made sense.
Yeah I agree with you on the 2nd paragraph.
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 11:07 pm
by Hentaiman
Yeah definitely.
Plus a theme doesn't means it has to sound the same or follow the same melody exactly.
I mean, it's not a concept album, first of all, and even concept albums who are obviously based on some concept still variate a lot and dont have to be like a long story with verses from tracks 1 to 14 for example.
no album should follow the exact same chord progression or melody in every song.
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 11:53 pm
by Tiny *[Banned]*
Hentaiman wrote:Yeah definitely.
Plus a theme doesn't means it has to sound the same or follow the same melody exactly.
I mean, it's not a concept album, first of all, and even concept albums who are obviously based on some concept still variate a lot and dont have to be like a long story with verses from tracks 1 to 14 for example.
no album should follow the exact same chord progression or melody in every song.
Excactly
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 1:40 am
by Mike
i would love to have them make a All Killer No Filler 2, the bonus track on UH are awesome, it would of been cool if the whole album was like that
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 2:00 am
by Dylan
^ yes but, they would be completely eaten up by critics and society. its one thing to make your first two CDs the same, and onther to have your 2nd and 5th to be the same. its just not acceptable. music is about maturing and moving on with each record.
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 5:18 am
by Hentaiman
Yeah, especially maturing in the world of punk.
like, in the same year the sums "matured" with Chuck, Good Charlotte matured with their mature album, and Green Day too.
But anyway, yeah, its pretty much true that the critics gonna eat them alive like that, though the only problem is that they already did with Underclass Hero and mosto of the critics hated it, which based on some's reviews just shows they haven't checked out the whole CD, how typical.
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 5:55 am
by Tiny *[Banned]*
Yeah but I agree with some of the critics most of the songs just seem like covers of other songs.
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 2:46 pm
by Hentaiman
i dont agree with that.
The critics keep bringing down Underclass Hero, saying it sounds like American Idiot and calling it American Idiot 2 (which is very untrue!) or comparing it to Blink 182 which i cannot see!
I mean, AKNF was very similar to Enema of the State but that's it, since then sum went a way away from Blink's style in DTLI and Chuck and UH is different.
Hate those comparisons, especially when they say that March of the Dogs sounds like blink's Easy Target.... WTF? it's not even close!
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 10:45 pm
by Tiny *[Banned]*
People just dont no what to say anymore.
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:33 am
by Mike
NoReason27 wrote:^ yes but, they would be completely eaten up by critics and society. its one thing to make your first two CDs the same, and onther to have your 2nd and 5th to be the same. its just not acceptable. music is about maturing and moving on with each record.
well the b-sides on Underclass Hero were like there 2nd album but more mature, im not saying it should sound exactly alike
and also, FUCK THE CRITICS i can care less what they think
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 11:06 am
by Hentaiman
Mike wrote:
FUCK THE CRITICS i can care less what they think
amen to that! 8)
Its just annoying to read those lameass critics bashing your fav. band and comparing the songs to some other bands, while like the March of the Dogs/Easy Target comparison, it has nothing in common!
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 10:55 pm
by Jeremy Kill
Yeah, but a lot of the melodies were the same from songs made before. But that happens with every modern musical artist. In the early 90's Nirvana was one of the greatest bands and their number one song had the riff copied off another song.
I don't know if people cared then, but they sure aren't as anal as they are nowadays.
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 12:28 am
by Hentaiman
yeah that's true.
Nirvana's Smells like a teen spirit riff appears on tons of Nirvana songs, most recentely i noticed it in the beginning of Nirvana's Rape Me, with a slight difference.
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 4:14 am
by Tiny *[Banned]*
Hentaiman wrote:yeah that's true.
Nirvana's Smells like a teen spirit riff appears on tons of Nirvana songs, most recentely i noticed it in the beginning of Nirvana's Rape Me, with a slight difference.
Yeah once when Rape me started I thought it was Smells like teen spirit.