Re: Women Are Stupid and I Don't Respect Them
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 11:47 pm
lmao, that was kinda weird, but I laughed my ass off with it! 

Awsome
https://archive.theresnosolution.com/
No. He is not gay unless he likes other men, or is "happy" as some people call it. You both incorrectly used the term.sara41 wrote:LOL!!!!!
Feelings are gay? You've got it all wrong, dude. YOU'RE gay.
why the fuck would you even think about locking? It's the most active thread in the section.. are we not allowed to have funny topics anymore? Example. Igod topicThis New Groove wrote:No. He is not gay unless he likes other men, or is "happy" as some people call it. You both incorrectly used the term.sara41 wrote:LOL!!!!!
Feelings are gay? You've got it all wrong, dude. YOU'RE gay.
I almost feel like locking this, but I suppose you all can laugh and let the section mods clean it up if it gets out of hand.
iGod topic again pl0xPeter wrote:why the fuck would you even think about locking? It's the most active thread in the section.. are we not allowed to have funny topics anymore? Example. Igod topicThis New Groove wrote:No. He is not gay unless he likes other men, or is "happy" as some people call it. You both incorrectly used the term.sara41 wrote:LOL!!!!!
Feelings are gay? You've got it all wrong, dude. YOU'RE gay.
I almost feel like locking this, but I suppose you all can laugh and let the section mods clean it up if it gets out of hand.
Apparently it was too funny so it had to be locked. And darn, we cannot have fun on TNS. No, we need to give warnings for adding a post meaningful to the topic.sara41 wrote:iGod is my idol <3
yeah!! I mean what if someone else has something to say, but they can't bump, so they make a whole new topic, then it'd end up being lockt cuz it's already been discussed?!sara41 wrote:Dude that sucks.. we need a forum with no rules whatsoever! <3 That'd be f-ing awesome! I agree mostly with getting rid of the "bumping" rule.
that has happenedGreenReem41 wrote:yeah!! I mean what if someone else has something to say, but they can't bump, so they make a whole new topic, then it'd end up being lockt cuz it's already been discussed?!sara41 wrote:Dude that sucks.. we need a forum with no rules whatsoever! <3 That'd be f-ing awesome! I agree mostly with getting rid of the "bumping" rule.
Half the forum lmfao over it.This New Groove wrote:I lock topics that are stupid and pointless.
I don't even know what the iGod topic was.
I'm sure it was really stupid.
Yeah, it was one of the best topics I've seen in this forum.Say Goodnight wrote:Half the forum lmfao over it.This New Groove wrote:I lock topics that are stupid and pointless.
I don't even know what the iGod topic was.
I'm sure it was really stupid.
is the iGod topic the one that R. made?Gibsum 41 wrote:Yeah, it was one of the best topics I've seen in this forum.Say Goodnight wrote:Half the forum lmfao over it.This New Groove wrote:I lock topics that are stupid and pointless.
I don't even know what the iGod topic was.
I'm sure it was really stupid.
Shouldn't there be exceptions for awesome topics like iGod?This New Groove wrote:is the iGod topic the one that R. made?Gibsum 41 wrote:Yeah, it was one of the best topics I've seen in this forum.Say Goodnight wrote:Half the forum lmfao over it.This New Groove wrote:I lock topics that are stupid and pointless.
I don't even know what the iGod topic was.
I'm sure it was really stupid.
The reason that was locked was because it had no posts for 3 months and then all of the sudden it got bumped. No bumping old topics. It's a mighty fine rule.