TheresNoSolution.com

MusicForTheMasses.com

Haha

^^good name

maybe for beginners [ like me ] have a section that gives links to websites, videos, etc... to help us get better.
for the protection thing, i guess having some kind of "exclusive" areas so that only people who are serious about making music can enter. By serious, i mean people who have given suggestions or proven that they are using the site as intended.

Nic wrote:Any ideas on a name people?

pleaserecordforme.com

V wrote:MusicForTheMasses.com

Haha

It's taken.

Woah.. Awesome.

I'm way cooler than I expected.

how about.

http://themusicproject.com/

and for the 'stealing songs' complaint, how about this: users are required to release their material with a creative commons share-alike license so anyone can use it as long as they attribute it to the original artist.

LTS wrote:how about.

http://themusicproject.com/

and for the 'stealing songs' complaint, how about this: users are required to release their material with a creative commons share-alike license so anyone can use it as long as they attribute it to the original artist.

That was the point this thread needed.

http://themusicproject.com/ is taken

wow...great idea.
and as for the stealing thing...it's going to happen no matter what. Serisously...what could to do to me if i herd a riff and took it and made it my own song and didn't post it and became famous and one day you were like "HEY FUCKER THAT WAS MINE!" nothing, really, cause i'd be famous and you wouldn't be. :D

but seriously...i suppose you would just need to know that it's going to happen no matter what. You can do as much as you can to minimize the stealing...but yeah.

and as for the name...how about:

thouplayistforye.com
ithinkyouplay.com
bonersareoverrated.com
themusicthosecrazykidslistento.com
wedontneednostinkintitle.com
musinetgeneration.com (like...music+internet=musinet...or maybe intemusic?)

actually...none of those are really serious :D

TheSoulIsOnTheCorner.com?

grandpa wrote:bonersareoverrated.com

hardcoresum41fan wrote:

grandpa wrote:bonersareoverrated.com

Come on guys! These domain names are way toooooooo long!

What about something like "http://www.weriff4u.com/" ?
http://www.recording4u.com/

i think its a very cool idea.

as for stealing songs, can't we make the new users agree to a terms of service form stating that one may not use another's posted ideas without consent. that would be the easiest. also, that creative commons license works too, Trent Reznor of Nine Inch Nails does that on his website with people making remixes and it seems to work just fine.

Say Goodnight wrote:http://www.theresnomusic.com/forum/index.php

*realizes I'm spamming the thread with laugh smilies*

ummm... Nics90thsite.com?

did anyone read my post about releasing the music via a creative commons sharalike 3.0???

that would solve any problems.

Anyone could take and use your riff as long as they atribute it to you.

That's how the baby works.


read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons_licenses
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons

Trent Reznor released NIN's album "Ghosts I-IV" with a CC3.0 license..

LTS wrote:did anyone read my post about releasing the music via a creative commons sharalike 3.0???

that would solve any problems.

Anyone could take and use your riff as long as they atribute it to you.

That's how the baby works.


read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons_licenses
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons

Trent Reznor released NIN's album "Ghosts I-IV" with a CC3.0 license..

Yeah I even pointed out that it was a good idea ;)

V wrote:

LTS wrote:did anyone read my post about releasing the music via a creative commons sharalike 3.0???

that would solve any problems.

Anyone could take and use your riff as long as they atribute it to you.

That's how the baby works.


read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons_licenses
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons

Trent Reznor released NIN's album "Ghosts I-IV" with a CC3.0 license..

Yeah I even pointed out that it was a good idea ;)

whoops. didn't see that. But it seemed all the other people ignored it.

LTS wrote:

V wrote:

LTS wrote:did anyone read my post about releasing the music via a creative commons sharalike 3.0???

that would solve any problems.

Anyone could take and use your riff as long as they atribute it to you.

That's how the baby works.


read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons_licenses
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons

Trent Reznor released NIN's album "Ghosts I-IV" with a CC3.0 license..

Yeah I even pointed out that it was a good idea ;)

whoops. didn't see that. But it seemed all the other people ignored it.

...but V noticed it

Say Goodnight wrote:

LTS wrote:

V wrote:

LTS wrote:did anyone read my post about releasing the music via a creative commons sharalike 3.0???

that would solve any problems.

Anyone could take and use your riff as long as they atribute it to you.

That's how the baby works.


read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons_licenses
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons

Trent Reznor released NIN's album "Ghosts I-IV" with a CC3.0 license..

Yeah I even pointed out that it was a good idea ;)

whoops. didn't see that. But it seemed all the other people ignored it.

...but V noticed it

YES!