Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 9:53 pm
yeah, that's right.
Tommy Lee's invitation doesnt mean shit though.Hentaiman wrote:yeah, that's right.
I mean, Iggy Pop and Tommy Lee invited him to play on their albums (Tommy Lee's "Tommyland The Ride" and Iggy Pop's Anthology), i mean, that's surprised even me, that they asked Deryck and not Dave who could nail some solos and crazy stuff there.
Why not? i mean, i dont like Tommy Lee either, but Tommyland is a pretty decent album, which at first downloaded cuz i read that Deryck played guitar there.sumfan wrote:Tommy Lee's invitation doesnt mean shit though.Hentaiman wrote:yeah, that's right.
I mean, Iggy Pop and Tommy Lee invited him to play on their albums (Tommy Lee's "Tommyland The Ride" and Iggy Pop's Anthology), i mean, that's surprised even me, that they asked Deryck and not Dave who could nail some solos and crazy stuff there.![]()
8)
I think he sucks ass. But i never THAT one album... link?Hentaiman wrote:Why not? i mean, i dont like Tommy Lee either, but Tommyland is a pretty decent album, which at first downloaded cuz i read that Deryck played guitar there.sumfan wrote:Tommy Lee's invitation doesnt mean shit though.Hentaiman wrote:yeah, that's right.
I mean, Iggy Pop and Tommy Lee invited him to play on their albums (Tommy Lee's "Tommyland The Ride" and Iggy Pop's Anthology), i mean, that's surprised even me, that they asked Deryck and not Dave who could nail some solos and crazy stuff there.![]()
8)
Plus i like Motley crue too.
thanks. :DHentaiman wrote:i'll try to up it myself tomorrow, or maybe there's a link somwhere....
pretty decent album, IMO.
Yes and yes :)Hentaiman wrote:np.
btw, if you like Good Charlotte, their lead vocalist (i think Joel was his name, right?) sings along with Tommy in one song.
Actually, for the record, the posts negative towards Deryck started after he posted a "statement" on the board about the whole situtation...which he later deleted and pretended never existed.Hentaiman wrote:Well as guys here said, he just came off as jerk b-cuz of all of those users who started opening posts like "sum 41 gonna suck without Dave" and that Deryck couldn't not play the guitar like Dave and stuff... so i can understand from where is the anger, cuz with Dave or not, they're still awesome, and Dave is awesome by himself.
Oh I agree. And at least he sorta realized he was in the wrong.Phili wrote:I think he knew that it was out of line and that's why he wrote the second one and deleted the first.
if deryck said it i believe him. why would he lie? I guess u were the producer of every sum 41's album since you know who wrote all the guitarsAsho_DirtyPoo wrote:He said Dave had nothing to do with the band. He had no influence on the sound, and he claimed that HE wrote all the guitar for hte band, and Dave just played it.
There was more, but that was what pissed me off the most.
He was slandering Dave.
And about his guitar business (SURPRIZE, I was one of the jerks haha)...well...it's true. If he can play all of Dave's guitar...why doesn't he? Why isn't there ANY guitar in the new songs? I'm just saying...
I know it still made an impact, but I forgave him because he clearly felt bad about it. He wanted to reassure fans, and in the process he took credit away from Dave, and he realized that and, if I recall correctly, he apologized for any misunderstanding.Asho_DirtyPoo wrote:Oh I agree. And at least he sorta realized he was in the wrong.Phili wrote:I think he knew that it was out of line and that's why he wrote the second one and deleted the first.
However, it's kinda like in court when something is said and then objected to, and "stricken from the record" - the jury still heard it, and it still made an impact.
So...if Deryck says one thing, and Dave says another...Dave has no reason to lie about it either...Byzzy wrote:if deryck said it i believe him. why would he lie? I guess u were the producer of every sum 41's album since you know who wrote all the guitarsAsho_DirtyPoo wrote:He said Dave had nothing to do with the band. He had no influence on the sound, and he claimed that HE wrote all the guitar for hte band, and Dave just played it.
There was more, but that was what pissed me off the most.
He was slandering Dave.
And about his guitar business (SURPRIZE, I was one of the jerks haha)...well...it's true. If he can play all of Dave's guitar...why doesn't he? Why isn't there ANY guitar in the new songs? I'm just saying...
Well that's true and i guess that's it.Asho_DirtyPoo wrote:So...if Deryck says one thing, and Dave says another...Dave has no reason to lie about it either...Byzzy wrote:if deryck said it i believe him. why would he lie? I guess u were the producer of every sum 41's album since you know who wrote all the guitarsAsho_DirtyPoo wrote:He said Dave had nothing to do with the band. He had no influence on the sound, and he claimed that HE wrote all the guitar for hte band, and Dave just played it.
There was more, but that was what pissed me off the most.
He was slandering Dave.
And about his guitar business (SURPRIZE, I was one of the jerks haha)...well...it's true. If he can play all of Dave's guitar...why doesn't he? Why isn't there ANY guitar in the new songs? I'm just saying...
As I said somewhere else - it's one person's word against the other. And it comes down to who we each choose to believe.