Page 2 of 6
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:25 pm
by Tiny *[Banned]*
sumfan wrote:Tiny wrote:Yeah...This may sound rude in a way but they cant really make music without Dave I mean the Heavy metal guitar solos were a big part of the band.
well i dont think so. i think they still make awsome music. :D lyricly their at theur best. but riff wise yea its gone down hill.
Yeah i mean their lyrics are awesome but they need the metal solos in the songs it would make the songs more complete.
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:57 pm
by washburn
Tiny wrote:sumfan wrote:Tiny wrote:Yeah...This may sound rude in a way but they cant really make music without Dave I mean the Heavy metal guitar solos were a big part of the band.
well i dont think so. i think they still make awsome music. :D lyricly their at theur best. but riff wise yea its gone down hill.
Yeah i mean their lyrics are awesome but they need the metal solos in the songs it would make the songs more complete.
yeah you're right, but it's not just the solos. the new album is missing riffs like in fat lip, hell song or over my head.. it feels like there's more layers of vocals instead of the guitar..
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 4:29 am
by Jeremy Kill
To me it would have to be Underclass Hero. It seems to have the least originality compared to the former albums.
Extremely catchy and I still think it's their lyrical best... But as a whole album compared to the previous ones, I don't like it as much.
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:36 am
by Dylan
HHOP is my least fav, personally. but i feel, AKNF is next. for me, they just keep getting better as time goes on. it seems that with UH, they aren't concentrating on making a "full" disc. HHOP-DTLI? seemed to me like a lot of it was filler.
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 4:23 pm
by ChapStick
AKNF, to commercial/poppy and i got tired of it (the songs are still good though!).
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 4:25 pm
by Phili
I REALLY don't think Sum 41 needs metal solos to be good. Sure it added to the songs, but they're fine without them.
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 4:50 pm
by Ken
AKNF.
Why do you post so much, Tiny?
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 4:51 pm
by Druska
AKNF it's great but I prefer the others
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 6:01 pm
by Tiny *[Banned]*
Ken of Contradiction wrote:AKNF.
Why do you post so much, Tiny?
What do you mean?
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:19 pm
by Phili
^He's just saying that you post density is pretty high.
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:20 pm
by Tiny *[Banned]*
Phili wrote:^He's just saying that you post density is pretty high.
What my number of post?
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:22 pm
by Phili
Um, look to the left.
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:23 pm
by Tiny *[Banned]*
Phili wrote:Um, look to the left.
What the number of how many post I have?
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:26 pm
by Phili
Your post number is on the left.
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:27 pm
by Tiny *[Banned]*
Phili wrote:Your post number is on the left.
Yeah what about it?
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:38 pm
by Phili
That's not what he was talking about. He was talking about your post density as of late.
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:42 pm
by Tiny *[Banned]*
Phili wrote:That's not what he was talking about. He was talking about your post density as of late.
I still dont get it
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:48 pm
by Phili
OK. What he means is that it seems like you've been posting A LOT for a certain amount of time.
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:49 pm
by Tiny *[Banned]*
Phili wrote:OK. What he means is that it seems like you've been posting A LOT for a certain amount of time.
Yeah so?
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:52 pm
by Phili
I was just explaining. I don't know what his point is.