Page 2 of 5

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 2:52 am
by Jeremy Kill
I feel bad for those who have lost loved ones on that day. Especially when this whole thing seemed so preventable in the first place (according to shows I've seen on television).

But you can't fight terrorism. I just don't think you can't. It's like re-enacting Vietnam. You can't go to war against something you can't see in plain sight.

And Maddox is a pretty funny guy.

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 2:57 am
by Rick
not even the people opposing conspiracy can prove why world trade center 7 collapsed. and do you not find it odd that the only three buildings in history to collapse because of a fire happened on the same day? and that the collapse is STRIKINGLY similar to a controlled demolition? i could go on, but i'm not, and theres more to it than loose change, i was just using that as an example. because it is by far the most popular. BUT something else is that BBC news had a reporter in new york, and she reported that WTC 7 collapsed 20 minutes before it happened, you can even see the building in the background.

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:23 am
by Lithium
i remember i wake up that day and my mom was scared about it and i asked her what is going on so she said all and turn off the tv and saw all that stuff was kinda scary

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 6:15 am
by Kylio
dm_rick wrote:not even the people opposing conspiracy can prove why world trade center 7 collapsed. and do you not find it odd that the only three buildings in history to collapse because of a fire happened on the same day? and that the collapse is STRIKINGLY similar to a controlled demolition? i could go on, but i'm not, and theres more to it than loose change, i was just using that as an example. because it is by far the most popular. BUT something else is that BBC news had a reporter in new york, and she reported that WTC 7 collapsed 20 minutes before it happened, you can even see the building in the background.
We get it. We get what you believe.
I think what people are trying to say, is that's not what we're trying to remember or think of today (technically yesterday), we want to be reminded of the people who died.

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:41 pm
by Rick
i know, i just want america to stop being blind.

question everything.

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 1:26 pm
by TomiT14
Ken of Contradiction wrote:I'm focusing on the LOST LIVES rather than if it was a secret attack from our government.
My thoughts exactly. Also what Kylio said, true words.

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 6:35 pm
by Jonny
If the conspiracy was so ingenious why would kids on the internet be able to work it out?

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:06 pm
by Rick
kids on the internet? i don't know what your talking about. the founders of the 9/11 truth movement were doctors. the founders are all experts. and asying that is like saying "how can 'kids on the internet' find out how a lightbulb works"

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:23 pm
by Jonny
but explain to me, why would the government want to kill thousands of it's own people?

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:39 pm
by Zam
Easy, the middle wire piece is a resistor, a very strong one. It creates a shitload of heat and light energy, hences, light. But I doubt we're talking bout that here...

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:55 pm
by Kylio

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:00 pm
by Zam
I'm just gonna say... RIP. That's all.

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:03 pm
by shivv_55
Zam wrote:I'm just gonna say... RIP. That's all.
i agree. RIP

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:12 pm
by Phili
Yeah, it doesn't matter why they died. They still died, and there was still debris flying everywhere, and the planes still crashed into the towers and killed many people with families instantly. That's all thay matters

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:24 am
by Pull_The_Curtis
fuckin hoax. fkn undercover secret usa shit. too many inconsistinsies. seriously, too many wierd things occured before and after the attacks, and George Bush has contradicted and himself too much and lied too much its just gotten frustrating, like for example, why thell was bush having breakfast with bin ladens brother that morning before the attacks occured, why did bush claim to see the attacks live on tv, why did all these important americsn figures cancelling things on the day..argh, so annnoying

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 3:05 am
by Rick
there is still NO explination why tower 7 fell. NO ONE has ever come up with a good reason why it fell like a controlled demolition because of a fire.

and for you people who feel sorry for the victims, i am as well sorry, and i'm also sorry for your wacko nutcase government. your country is seriously fucked up. no offense.

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 3:10 am
by Zam
I do hate Bush and I do think he is hiding something. I don't think, however, this was completely an inside job.

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 3:21 am
by Rick
no i think there is plenty of sides to it, and know what i'm angry about? the pentagon. there WAS video footage of the "plane" hitting it. the FBI took it and released 8 frames, which show NO plane, or any flying device i.e rocket.

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 4:41 am
by LTS
let me tell you why it would fall like a controlled demolition from a fire. a controlled demolition most of the time they blow out the very bottom supporting structure and it falls to the ground. a fire that burned away a supporting structure that held the majority of the pressure of the building would make a building collapse. also, of the pentagon, there was PLANE DEBRIS and the still shots from the parking camera did show a plane but it was going so fast it couldn't capture it all. It's like trying to take a picture of lightning.. it's moving to fast and unless you have a very quick camera it's hard to be done...

also.. i think people who beleive 9/11 was an inside job are just about as ignorant as the people who say Jesus wasn't a real person. Like the ideas or not, there is historical evidence prooving things. Don't question facts.

another thing, i don't think 9/11 was an inside job, but i do think it could have been prevented. The security at airports could have been better, communications in the air, and there were probally some details the government skipped over that were very important.

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 5:09 am
by Laxman 41
It is not a hoax, I can't believe people would think its a hoax! I'm majoring in civil engineering and its all simple mechanics of materials, when the steel is heated it expands depending on its modulus of elasticity, I agree that heat could not "melt" the steel, but the very fact that is caused expansion in the steel, forced other members in the truss to expand also, all of the expansion led to the collapse of the structure, building were not built to deal with heat of that magnitude.

Our hearts go out to those who lost loved ones on that day.