Page 2 of 2
Re: SBM vs UH
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 7:35 pm
by PyroAMYac
I want to kill that guy too. It's not even a legitimate review, it's just a guy saying "SBM sucks" and saying how it's different from UH!!! AAARRRGGHHHH.
Re: SBM vs UH
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:39 pm
by Raku
Jeremy Kill wrote:Five votes for Underclass Hero? Every post in this thread so far has been for Screaming Bloody Murder! Who are the five that are too scared to post? C'mon now... don't be scared.
I voted for UH, I'm a sucker for fun songs =/
Re: SBM vs UH
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:41 pm
by FuckT41182
PyroAMYac wrote:
I want to kill that guy too. It's not even a legitimate review, it's just a guy saying "SBM sucks" and saying how it's different from UH!!! AAARRRGGHHHH.
you look very serious to me, cause everytime my eyes collide with your name, they read Army instead of Amy ...
Re: SBM vs UH
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 9:30 pm
by gejmik
"GameEs: This is a new record why the fuck does reviewer just linking on their previous records?
Satellite: he's got you there jared"
I know I do! #WINNING!
"And I didn't talk about youtube reviews or whatever. But I mentioned the fact that the reviewer reffers on the fact that under new Sum 41 songs/updates is everywhere "SBM sux" which just isn't true. Fans love it and I know about many people that started listening to Sum 41 just because of this record. And yeah, I think it's their best work. Reviewer keeps refering about Fat Lip. I don't know why? They changed their sound so much since then. They're not 19 years old anymore! They are in 30-ties, they don't want to do "skate-pop-punk" anymore. Is it so hard to understand?"
I'm out of control. That reviewer doesn't say any reasonable argument. He just says SBM sux. That's all. I don't consider this as a review.
Re: SBM vs UH
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 12:34 am
by sumfan4
Damn, UH is getting raped.