Possible song titles?

[TomiT14]

Wasn't Jessica Kill a working title for a song on UH?

Working title for EP songs.

[samueeL]

Wasn't Jessica Kill a working title for a song on UH?

Working title for EP songs.

We don't know that!

[TomiT14]

Wasn't Jessica Kill a working title for a song on UH?

Working title for an EP song.

We don't know that!

Well I mean originally it was the title for an EP song, not for an UH song.

Now I think Jessica Kill will stick to the album. The title has been around a year already, so I'll doubt they would change it.

[samueeL]

No, I mean I think it was written after EP songs.

Here's your "Black Eyes"



You can see "A" too before "C", but it's too hard to catch.

[TomiT14]

No, I mean I think it was written after EP songs.

Well that pic you posted is from the EP era.

[samueeL]

It was taken just before new year when deryck wrote "a big bunch of songs"

But nah, we can't know. We should ask Deryck after album comes out.

[Hentaiman]

I don't think you guys should address the EP and the album as two different things. The EP is basically the first stage of the album. The album, the one they are recording now, is basically a continuation of the EP, so yeah, even though Deryck said that he outdone most of the songs from the EP, obviously some songs from the EP will stay in some form or another. They are basically the same thing, back even when they did the EP, Deryck said its going to be dark, heavy and aggressive and all, and the album basically continues that line.

[samueeL]

He said he has outdone all of the songs

[Jeremy Kill]

WaveCache sounds like a sweet song! So does Session File Backups! Can't wait to hear those!
j/k

[TomiT14]

He said he has outdone all of the songs

Just like he outdid Subject To Change into No Reason and Underclass Hero.

The song could still have same parts than in the beginning, even if it's been outdone.
So even though the song evolves, it doesn't mean the title should be changed.

They were still working on EP in early 2009, until they decided to stretch it to an album.
So all the work that happened until early 2009, I see that being EP era.

And like Hentai said, working for EP and the new album is the same thing.
The EP songs have now evolved to better songs. It doesn't mean all of the EP content is now disappeared.

[Hentaiman]

He said he has outdone all of the songs

Just like he outdid Subject To Change into No Reason and Underclass Hero.

The song could still have same parts than in the beginning, even if it's been outdone.
So even though the song evolves, it doesn't mean the title should be changed.

They were still working on EP in early 2009, until they decided to stretch it to an album.
So all the work that happened until early 2009, I see that being EP era.

And like Hentai said, working for EP and the new album is the same thing.
The EP songs have now evolved to better songs. It doesn't mean all of the EP content is now disappeared.

Yeah, exactly, the album is in the same direction and state of mind that Deryck has said before about the EP, so its a continuation basically. Its not like that they stopped making the EP and announced they are making an electro-hip-hop full-length album, scrapping the dark and heavy EP.

[samueeL]

I remember him saying that the EP stuff was a bit different, hmm. But hey, we all are allowed to have opinions.

[Jeremy Kill]

I know Deryck said in the Absolute Punk forum chat that he was making an EP of more aggressive songs. If he kept "outdoing" these songs with songs he was writing for the now soon-to-be album, then he must've still been writing songs in the vein of dark, aggressive, fast... etc. because can you really "outdo" a song you've already written if it's completely different from the original?

Either way, I really hope I enjoy this album. All that shit with Pieces and The Scientist, Underclass Hero taking inspiration from American Idiot... it's all made me too critical of their music and I just want a Sum 41 album I can pop into my car and go, "fuck yeah, this is what I need."

[Jesus Christ Supermarket]

I know Deryck said in the Absolute Punk forum chat that he was making an EP of more aggressive songs. If he kept "outdoing" these songs with songs he was writing for the now soon-to-be album, then he must've still been writing songs in the vein of dark, aggressive, fast... etc. because can you really "outdo" a song you've already written if it's completely different from the original?

Either way, I really hope I enjoy this album. All that shit with Pieces and The Scientist, Underclass Hero taking inspiration from American Idiot... it's all made me too critical of their music and I just want a Sum 41 album I can pop into my car and go, "fuck yeah, this is what I need."

Exactly. When I listen to Sum 41... I want to listen to Sum 41.

[Jake-41]

He said he has outdone all of the songs

Just like he outdid Subject To Change into No Reason and Underclass Hero.

The song could still have same parts than in the beginning, even if it's been outdone.
So even though the song evolves, it doesn't mean the title should be changed.

They were still working on EP in early 2009, until they decided to stretch it to an album.
So all the work that happened until early 2009, I see that being EP era.

And like Hentai said, working for EP and the new album is the same thing.
The EP songs have now evolved to better songs. It doesn't mean all of the EP content is now disappeared.

Yeah, exactly, the album is in the same direction and state of mind that Deryck has said before about the EP, so its a continuation basically. Its not like that they stopped making the EP and announced they are making an electro-hip-hop full-length album, scrapping the dark and heavy EP.

I get it, and agree with the logic.
Song alone = shit. Make a change, mix that shit song, with something that has potential, and you get a better song. Which you can obsly take from No Reason/noots. Noots being shit.

EDIT: Meant to say Subject To Change/No Reason. Ya get the idea, though.

[Jeremy Kill]

He said he has outdone all of the songs

Just like he outdid Subject To Change into No Reason and Underclass Hero.

The song could still have same parts than in the beginning, even if it's been outdone.
So even though the song evolves, it doesn't mean the title should be changed.

They were still working on EP in early 2009, until they decided to stretch it to an album.
So all the work that happened until early 2009, I see that being EP era.

And like Hentai said, working for EP and the new album is the same thing.
The EP songs have now evolved to better songs. It doesn't mean all of the EP content is now disappeared.

Yeah, exactly, the album is in the same direction and state of mind that Deryck has said before about the EP, so its a continuation basically. Its not like that they stopped making the EP and announced they are making an electro-hip-hop full-length album, scrapping the dark and heavy EP.

I get it, and agree with the logic.
Song alone = shit. Make a change, mix that shit song, with something that has potential, and you get a better song. Which you can obsly take from No Reason/noots. Noots being shit.

What?! You don't like Noots?

[Jake-41]

He said he has outdone all of the songs

Just like he outdid Subject To Change into No Reason and Underclass Hero.

The song could still have same parts than in the beginning, even if it's been outdone.
So even though the song evolves, it doesn't mean the title should be changed.

They were still working on EP in early 2009, until they decided to stretch it to an album.
So all the work that happened until early 2009, I see that being EP era.

And like Hentai said, working for EP and the new album is the same thing.
The EP songs have now evolved to better songs. It doesn't mean all of the EP content is now disappeared.

Yeah, exactly, the album is in the same direction and state of mind that Deryck has said before about the EP, so its a continuation basically. Its not like that they stopped making the EP and announced they are making an electro-hip-hop full-length album, scrapping the dark and heavy EP.

I get it, and agree with the logic.
Song alone = shit. Make a change, mix that shit song, with something that has potential, and you get a better song. Which you can obsly take from No Reason/noots. Noots being shit.

What?! You don't like Noots?

I love n00ts. But No Reason is superior! It's just shit in that sense. But who knows which actually came first.
But shit. Now i can't decide if n00ts is better than No Reason. Hmmm..

[Jeremy Kill]

He said he has outdone all of the songs

Just like he outdid Subject To Change into No Reason and Underclass Hero.

The song could still have same parts than in the beginning, even if it's been outdone.
So even though the song evolves, it doesn't mean the title should be changed.

They were still working on EP in early 2009, until they decided to stretch it to an album.
So all the work that happened until early 2009, I see that being EP era.

And like Hentai said, working for EP and the new album is the same thing.
The EP songs have now evolved to better songs. It doesn't mean all of the EP content is now disappeared.

Yeah, exactly, the album is in the same direction and state of mind that Deryck has said before about the EP, so its a continuation basically. Its not like that they stopped making the EP and announced they are making an electro-hip-hop full-length album, scrapping the dark and heavy EP.

I get it, and agree with the logic.
Song alone = shit. Make a change, mix that shit song, with something that has potential, and you get a better song. Which you can obsly take from No Reason/noots. Noots being shit.

What?! You don't like Noots?

I love n00ts. But No Reason is superior! It's just shit in that sense. But who knows which actually came first.
But shit. Now i can't decide if n00ts is better than No Reason. Hmmm..

I definitely enjoy No Reason over Noots, but I also think Noots was good enough to be included on Chuck.

[Jesus Christ Supermarket]

I always liked Sum 41 pre- Chuck, but Noots made Sum 41 one of top 10 favorite bands.

[Jeremy Kill]

EDIT: Meant to say Subject To Change/No Reason. Ya get the idea, though.

Oh yeah, okay I thought that's what you meant haha, since Noots and No Reason are like completely different.

I still liked Subject to Change though. The only thing that bugged me about the song was the chorus. It just didn't fit. The song as a whole is a mess compared to No Reason, but it had its moments. I love that line in the verse, "It's only a problem when it happens to you" and the bridge. They included the bridge in No Reason, but it's masked by the chorus and it just passes you by. The intro of Subject to Change was cool too, like how it progressed. I wonder if they'll have songs like that on the new album rather than just busting out the main riff front and center.

Anyway, those are my thoughts, haha. I don't know why, I just really feel like typing tonight.