Re: NASA Bombs The Moon
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 8:49 am
i wonder that tooCIRCUITzach wrote:wait. we landed on the moon?
i wonder that tooCIRCUITzach wrote:wait. we landed on the moon?
America is 11 trillion dollars in debt?!mikey41 wrote:well when you're 11 trillion dollars in debt 70 million probably shouldn't be thrown away just to see the inside of a fairly large rocksamueeL wrote:lol 70 million is nothing
first of all, if you're going to criticize a group as dumb, dont act like a dumbshit yourself.Tyler41 wrote:how does what i said make me "mentally ill"? gtfofinglemaster wrote:Are you mentally ill? They don't have just space drills ready to send up to the moon. This is the best way of doing it.Tyler41 wrote:thats a fucking stupid idea. if you wanna find out if theres water under the surface, go drill a hole or something, dont shoot fucking rockets at it. holy fuck nasa is dumb.
If they discover ice or water in the explosion, it can be fact there is a source of water still on the moon. And water's a big deal.
you overreacted big time about my comment. you need to calm the fuck down. i'll criticize whatever i want in whatever dumb way i want. stop being a fucking faggoty ass cunt.finglemaster wrote:first of all, if you're going to criticize a group as dumb, dont act like a dumbshit yourself.Tyler41 wrote:how does what i said make me "mentally ill"? gtfofinglemaster wrote:Are you mentally ill? They don't have just space drills ready to send up to the moon. This is the best way of doing it.Tyler41 wrote:thats a fucking stupid idea. if you wanna find out if theres water under the surface, go drill a hole or something, dont shoot fucking rockets at it. holy fuck nasa is dumb.
If they discover ice or water in the explosion, it can be fact there is a source of water still on the moon. And water's a big deal.
They're not shooting rockets at the moon. They're not bombing anything. They're crashing an object into it.
They don't know if there has been or still is water there. The places on the moon they call "seas" and "oceans" were named that way by early astronomers. If they discover water it will be a huge deal. Water is an evergrowing scarcity on earth. If America discovers it...
"want" and "cunt" rhyme. win.Tyler41 wrote:you overreacted big time about my comment. you need to calm the fuck down. i'll criticize whatever i want in whatever dumb way i want. stop being a fucking faggoty ass cunt.finglemaster wrote:first of all, if you're going to criticize a group as dumb, dont act like a dumbshit yourself.Tyler41 wrote:how does what i said make me "mentally ill"? gtfofinglemaster wrote:Are you mentally ill? They don't have just space drills ready to send up to the moon. This is the best way of doing it.Tyler41 wrote:thats a fucking stupid idea. if you wanna find out if theres water under the surface, go drill a hole or something, dont shoot fucking rockets at it. holy fuck nasa is dumb.
If they discover ice or water in the explosion, it can be fact there is a source of water still on the moon. And water's a big deal.
They're not shooting rockets at the moon. They're not bombing anything. They're crashing an object into it.
They don't know if there has been or still is water there. The places on the moon they call "seas" and "oceans" were named that way by early astronomers. If they discover water it will be a huge deal. Water is an evergrowing scarcity on earth. If America discovers it...
All he said was, "Are you mentally ill?". If anything you're overreacting to his comment with this one. Also, depending on your accent, "want" and "cunt" don't really rhyme unless you pronounce "cunt" like "kawnt" or "want" like "wunt."Tyler41 wrote:you overreacted big time about my comment. you need to calm the fuck down. i'll criticize whatever i want in whatever dumb way i want. stop being a fucking faggoty ass cunt.finglemaster wrote:first of all, if you're going to criticize a group as dumb, dont act like a dumbshit yourself.Tyler41 wrote:how does what i said make me "mentally ill"? gtfofinglemaster wrote:Are you mentally ill? They don't have just space drills ready to send up to the moon. This is the best way of doing it.Tyler41 wrote:thats a fucking stupid idea. if you wanna find out if theres water under the surface, go drill a hole or something, dont shoot fucking rockets at it. holy fuck nasa is dumb.
If they discover ice or water in the explosion, it can be fact there is a source of water still on the moon. And water's a big deal.
They're not shooting rockets at the moon. They're not bombing anything. They're crashing an object into it.
They don't know if there has been or still is water there. The places on the moon they call "seas" and "oceans" were named that way by early astronomers. If they discover water it will be a huge deal. Water is an evergrowing scarcity on earth. If America discovers it...
Dude, havent you seen the movie armogeoddon?!?!?!finglemaster wrote:Are you mentally ill? They don't have just space drills ready to send up to the moon. This is the best way of doing it.Tyler41 wrote:thats a fucking stupid idea. if you wanna find out if theres water under the surface, go drill a hole or something, dont shoot fucking rockets at it. holy fuck nasa is dumb.
If they discover ice or water in the explosion, it can be fact there is a source of water still on the moon. And water's a big deal.
Yeah. I can see you're to be taken seriously. Have a nice lifeTyler41 wrote:you overreacted big time about my comment. you need to calm the fuck down. i'll criticize whatever i want in whatever dumb way i want. stop being a fucking faggoty ass cunt.finglemaster wrote:first of all, if you're going to criticize a group as dumb, dont act like a dumbshit yourself.Tyler41 wrote:how does what i said make me "mentally ill"? gtfofinglemaster wrote:Are you mentally ill? They don't have just space drills ready to send up to the moon. This is the best way of doing it.Tyler41 wrote:thats a fucking stupid idea. if you wanna find out if theres water under the surface, go drill a hole or something, dont shoot fucking rockets at it. holy fuck nasa is dumb.
If they discover ice or water in the explosion, it can be fact there is a source of water still on the moon. And water's a big deal.
They're not shooting rockets at the moon. They're not bombing anything. They're crashing an object into it.
They don't know if there has been or still is water there. The places on the moon they call "seas" and "oceans" were named that way by early astronomers. If they discover water it will be a huge deal. Water is an evergrowing scarcity on earth. If America discovers it...
I'd have to agree with you. This isn't the Cold War anymore. People nowadays don't really care about Space exploration. It just doesn't seem all that important right now.nesabelle wrote:If the next president wanted to cut NASA funding to better help our economy, would you be outraged? As much as I love space and all that stuff I wouldn't be all that angry if the next president cut NASA funding to better the economy. Just think about how much it would it help. I mean we spend billions on space travel and from my knowledge we haven't colonized any planet yet. But tell me your opinion!
That's one way of looking at it. On the other hand, NASA also forms a big part of the US economy in other aspects.nesabelle wrote:If the next president wanted to cut NASA funding to better help our economy, would you be outraged? As much as I love space and all that stuff I wouldn't be all that angry if the next president cut NASA funding to better the economy. Just think about how much it would it help. I mean we spend billions on space travel and from my knowledge we haven't colonized any planet yet. But tell me your opinion!
thanks?Jake! wrote:This thread was clearly made by a retard.