TheresNoSolution.com

Jake! wrote:

2712 wrote:How about albums with quality over 320? I've got a few, mainly NIN albums.

Thats a fucking stupid idea.

192 is the highest bit rate that can be distinguished by the human ear unless you have like 22.1 surround sound. Which no one has.

Thank you, I've been saying that forever and everybody was like dumbass and I was like. It's a waste of hard drive space, although I will admit I'd have enough space for all my music to be lossless and still have space free.

Boni Boy Blue wrote:

Jake! wrote:

2712 wrote:How about albums with quality over 320? I've got a few, mainly NIN albums.

Thats a fucking stupid idea.

192 is the highest bit rate that can be distinguished by the human ear unless you have like 22.1 surround sound. Which no one has.

Thank you, I've been saying that forever and everybody was like dumbass and I was like. It's a waste of hard drive space, although I will admit I'd have enough space for all my music to be lossless and still have space free.

Same.
And 320 just sounds better to people.

I invite everybody to come and listen to the difference between 198-320-1040 in my car. Trust me, It makes a difference. I know I don't need anything over 320, but it's a nice touch.

320 is the best.
/thread

^it may be the most ideal, but you can't say it's the best if there's higher bit rates, and that's a fact. Let's stop talk about freaking bit rates and talk about peters other gay ideas.

listen to vinyl.

I don't like keeping stuff on 320kbps and stuff when on my MP4 player and such cuz I have 8GB and if all the music I had there now would've been 320, I'll probably would have no space left after putting just the Sum 41, Rise Against and Iron Maiden discographies.