TheresNoSolution.com

RIP Blink 182: 1994 - 2003

FuckT41182 wrote:

Tyler. wrote:

Filespit wrote:So I finally heard the song. What do I think after a first listen? It sounds like an Angels & Airwaves b-side. I sure hope the album has a higher tempo than this.

Do you mean that literally? Because the song's actually pretty fast...

if this wasn't a joke than excuse my 10 minutes long laughter XD the only 'fast' part is the riff that seems a lot out of place

The whole song is 156bpm. That's a decently fast Tempo for a rock song.

2712 wrote:

FuckT41182 wrote:

Tyler. wrote:

Filespit wrote:So I finally heard the song. What do I think after a first listen? It sounds like an Angels & Airwaves b-side. I sure hope the album has a higher tempo than this.

Do you mean that literally? Because the song's actually pretty fast...

if this wasn't a joke than excuse my 10 minutes long laughter XD the only 'fast' part is the riff that seems a lot out of place

The whole song is 156bpm. That's a decently fast Tempo for a rock song.

how fast is Stocholm Syndrome than ?

if songs like those will be called fast then it's fucked, it might be a good song, but far away from fast, and that technical bullshit doesn't interest me at all

SBMurder wrote:How do you think Tom is gonna sound live signing this?

I was thinking about this last night. I mean, clearly, he doesn't sound like he used to sound so I don't think it'll sound bad imo. His voice doesn't really suit the old blink songs now, especially when he's drunk, but because this song shows the way he sounds now I'd say he'll sound alright.

I got quite confused by the title, I thought that it would be about having too much fun and staying up all night, I wasn't prepared to something more "mature". I think this song is okay, I'll have to listen to the whole record to make my mind on the new blink music though.

Wow. I don't like this at all. Sounds like an A&A reject song. And I didn't even like A&A.

And people were saying Sum 41 is a lesser version of Blink?

Chorus ruins the songs, and the bridge sucks. But I like the verses.

Ashasx wrote:Wow. I don't like this at all. Sounds like an A&A reject song. And I didn't even like A&A.

And people were saying Sum 41 is a lesser version of Blink?

first, people were saying that Sum 41 got signed with IR because of the fact that Blink 182 did a big pop punk boom with Enema, without Enema IR would never realize what a big case of money they can get out from signing a pop-punk band ...

second, one bad song(possibly album) doesn't make the band bad, it just means that they have one bad album among a bunch of some great ones

third, even though I am very far from liking Up All Night, I seriously doubt that the new Blink 182 album will be worse than Underclass Hero

DeryckW wrote:RIP Blink 182: 1994 - 2003

Lol get the fuck over yourself

Lol Tyler you are so defensive of this band.

FuckT41182 wrote:

Ashasx wrote:Wow. I don't like this at all. Sounds like an A&A reject song. And I didn't even like A&A.

And people were saying Sum 41 is a lesser version of Blink?

first, people were saying that Sum 41 got signed with IR because of the fact that Blink 182 did a big pop punk boom with Enema, without Enema IR would never realize what a big case of money they can get out from signing a pop-punk band ...

second, one bad song(possibly album) doesn't make the band bad, it just means that they have one bad album among a bunch of some great ones

third, even though I am very far from liking Up All Night, I seriously doubt that the new Blink 182 album will be worse than Underclass Hero

UH fucking rocked!

DeryckW wrote:RIP Blink 182: 1994 - 2003

Wouldn't go that far, it's just one song. There are plenty of bands that released a single and I wasn't to fond of it. Screaming Bloody Murder for example. Didn't really like the song to much but I loved the album.

DeryckW wrote:RIP Blink 182: 1994 - 2003

RIP blink 182 1994 - 2001

Don't start bitching yet, the album ain't even out yet..

Something interesting to share...

hmm, I've just read Mark's statement that the Up All Night was supposed to be softer, but they wanted their first single to be more ROCK sounding, omfg, if the other songs will be even softer than I'll be listening to the 2 last records by Simple Plan for 16 years

FuckT41182 wrote:hmm, I've just read Mark's statement that the Up All Night was supposed to be softer, but they wanted their first single to be more ROCK sounding, omfg, if the other songs will be even softer than I'll be listening to the 2 last records by Simple Plan for 16 years

This doesn't mean the other songs will be softer !

there is a tracklist posted on wikipedia, most likely a fake, but whatever ...
1. Up All Night
2. Ghosts On The Dancefloor
3. Neighborhoods
4. Seperation
5. Losing a Friend
6. Snake Charmer
7. The Shadow
8. Ace
9. Grow
10. The Nightime Sky
11. Stars and Suns

ptido wrote:

FuckT41182 wrote:hmm, I've just read Mark's statement that the Up All Night was supposed to be softer, but they wanted their first single to be more ROCK sounding, omfg, if the other songs will be even softer than I'll be listening to the 2 last records by Simple Plan for 16 years

This doesn't mean the other songs will be softer !

it doesn't, but if they say that in their eyes Up All Night is less electronic and more rock song, than it just makes me think if there will be more electro sounds on the rest of the album ...

patenttiftw wrote:I DON'T LIKE THE SONG AT ALL EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWHHH

.. you come back after how long and you say that?
I'm not a huge fan of the single artwork.