TheresNoSolution.com

Absolutely hilarious.

I find it disappointing that Rise Against's new album is getting better reviews than Screaming Bloody Murder from some of the reviewers. Endgame was so cookie-cutter.

BanZ0 wrote:Rolling Stone fails, the song they're suggesting to listen to in the review isn't even Sum 41.. It's some shitty cover of Screaming Bloody Murder with an italian accent

No really, but how they can call themselves " professionials " ? But it's Rolling Stone, here in Italy last year they put on the front as rockstar of the year Silvio Berlusconi....

ALTER THE PRESS!
http://www.alterthepress.com/2011/03/al ... loody.html
RATING 3.5/5

LEXINGTON MUSIC PRESS
http://lmpmagazine.com/2011/03/29/revie ... dy-murder/
7.5/10

PROPERTYOFZACK
http://propertyofzack.com/post/41865573 ... iew-sum-41
2.5/5

tmc themusiccycle
http://themusiccycle.com/archives/3932
4.5/5

http://pulpmagazinelive.com/main/?p=649
Most positive I've seen so far.

Jeremy Kill wrote:I find it disappointing that Rise Against's new album is getting better reviews than Screaming Bloody Murder from some of the reviewers. Endgame was so cookie-cutter.

Yeah, I love Rise Against but Endgame was pretty bland with every song sounding the alike.

Emil wrote:

Jeremy Kill wrote:I find it disappointing that Rise Against's new album is getting better reviews than Screaming Bloody Murder from some of the reviewers. Endgame was so cookie-cutter.

Yeah, I love Rise Against but Endgame was pretty bland with every song sounding the alike.

Yeah definitely. I love the band but it was the most disappointing Rise Against album ever! And it still getting better reviews than SBM which is original and a step forward for the Sums!

Hentaiman wrote:

Emil wrote:

Jeremy Kill wrote:I find it disappointing that Rise Against's new album is getting better reviews than Screaming Bloody Murder from some of the reviewers. Endgame was so cookie-cutter.

Yeah, I love Rise Against but Endgame was pretty bland with every song sounding the alike.

Yeah definitely. I love the band but it was the most disappointing Rise Against album ever! And it still getting better reviews than SBM which is original and a step forward for the Sums!

I think because Rise Against it's seen by the Media (Magazines,Websites) as a great band and all they put out is great, instead the Sums are seen as a funny teen pop punk band and they can't do anything else. Reputation is really important and the Sums have, generally, a " bad media reputation " .

Radiohead could release an album of Dolphin farts and it would get rave reviews.

Bobbyjames wrote:Radiohead could release an album of Dolphin farts and it would get rave reviews.

True

Haha, this album is getting really mixed reviews. Others seem to like it a lot, while others say it's once again a typical sum41-record, with some rock-opera thrown in, and give it low scores.

Sputnik review is by far the harshest...

stevo32 wrote:

BanZ0 wrote:Rolling Stone fails, the song they're suggesting to listen to in the review isn't even Sum 41.. It's some shitty cover of Screaming Bloody Murder with an italian accent

No really, but how they can call themselves " professionials " ? But it's Rolling Stone, here in Italy last year they put on the front as rockstar of the year Silvio Berlusconi....

that's cos he's a rockstar

guys the emoticons aren't working on v3

Bobbyjames wrote:Radiohead could release an album of Dolphin farts and it would get rave reviews.

Wow, amen to that, bro!

Positive review from IGN:

http://music.ign.com/articles/115/1158615p1.html

8/10

Ashasx wrote:Positive review from IGN:

http://music.ign.com/articles/115/1158615p1.html

8/10

A positive review from IGN is the last thing I expected honestly

BanZ0 wrote:

Ashasx wrote:Positive review from IGN:

http://music.ign.com/articles/115/1158615p1.html

8/10

A positive review from IGN is the last thing I expected honestly

Me too. They gave Chuck a 6.8.

Though they had a solid review of DTLI back in the day.

dbauer91, why would you link this thread on sputnik? I thought the comments portion of that review was dead. Certainly appreciate that.

~

Now they're commenting on stuff we've said. What did they really expect on a forum specifically dedicated to the band? They're arguing against what I've said as if what I posted on here is what I posted on their review.

There is a serious double standard with some of the posters on that website.

Response to somebody who had commented on Sum 41 fans' apparent dislike for the review:

"Angry kids discovered the internet and don't understand opinions that conflict with their own. Nothing new"

Four posts later, a response to somebody who likes the album:

"do real canadians even like sum 41? why would they even bother when they have billy talent"

Isn't the first quote a direct contradiction to the second one? It's okay to dislike Sum 41 and/or the album, as it's an opinion (correct), but when somebody does like the album, they get the response of quote #2? Am I missing something here? Why hasn't this guy (and the dozens of other posts) been called out like all of the other people who have given praise to the album?

sputnikmusic wrote:http://oi51.tinypic.com/otnkwp.jpg

http://moaropeth.tumblr.com

please don't stop, guys. <3