Page 6 of 18

Re: 12 min song discussion

Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:37 pm
by Jesus Christ Supermarket
they said that this album's gonna be dark and agressive but also with some funny parts ...maybe this song will show it ...although I can't imagine it ...but as I look at it now ...Blink 182 album TOYPAJ was also funny and then more serious ...
Funny parts? When the did they say that?
If it's anything like Jesus of Suburbia I'll be happy.
I prefer it not to have anything similar to Green Day.

Re: 12 min song discussion

Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:27 pm
by Lars
Jesus Christ Supermarket wrote: Funny parts? When the did they say that?
I believe Stevo said that in one of the interviews. Look it up in the Warped Articles-topic.
If it's anything like Jesus of Suburbia I'll be happy.
I prefer it not to have anything similar to Green Day.
Neither do I, but I think he meant structural-wise, not musical wise. So as long it's not musical wise, I'm okay with it.

Re: 12 min song discussion

Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:30 pm
by HugoDisasters
Whether it's Jesus of Suburbia or not. All i care about it is being Sum 41. Nothing else.
It wont suck as long as it's Sum 41 how bad they even do it. That's being a true fan, or a deaf person.

Re: 12 min song discussion

Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 7:04 am
by Mr-David-Blues
It wont sound nothing like Jesus of Suburbia I was just suggesting the title(s) for the song(s) will be similar layed out

Re: 12 min song discussion

Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 9:28 pm
by Lars
I have no problems with delays...

Though with cancels (like THE B-side).

Re: 12 min song discussion

Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:42 pm
by Raku
Lars wrote:I have no problems with delays...
Try saying that for the blink album (unless you're not a fan)
Lars wrote:Though with cancels (like THE B-side).
Sum 41 was going to release songs never heard before? Man, that would've been awesome to listen to some old/new songs unreleased.

Re: 12 min song discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:36 am
by Lars
Raku wrote:
Lars wrote:I have no problems with delays...
Try saying that for the blink album (unless you're not a fan)
As a Blink-fan, I would be happy they got back together in the first place, actually. But I do get your point completely.

Re: 12 min song discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:45 pm
by HugoDisasters
Isn't it like 14th year anniversary for Sum41 31st July?
Maybe they are releasing it then.

Re: 12 min song discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:15 pm
by Lars
I probably shouldn't, but I'm getting really impatient here!

Just fucking excited.

Re: 12 min song discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:58 pm
by Gregorovich
FakeNinja wrote:Isn't it like 14th year anniversary for Sum41 31st July?
Maybe they are releasing it then.
I bloody hope so, otherwise I may just spontaneously combust.

Re: 12 min song discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:42 pm
by nukeboy
Raku wrote:
Lars wrote:I have no problems with delays...
Try saying that for the blink album (unless you're not a fan)
Lars wrote:Though with cancels (like THE B-side).
Sum 41 was going to release songs never heard before? Man, that would've been awesome to listen to some old/new songs unreleased.
It would be rad if they re-recorded In Too Deep, and recorded the song like how the play it live.

Re: 12 min song discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:46 pm
by TomiT14
nukeboy wrote:It would be rad if they re-recorded In Too Deep, and recorded the song like how the play it live.
Well, the only difference between the album and live versions is the intro, which is already recorded as the intro of Confusion And Frustration.

Yeah, I know it's a simple intro, and could hardly be called an intro for CAFIMT.
But whenever they played CAFIMT live they played intro for In Too Deep like it's on the album.
So that's why I'd like to call it CAFIMT intro, since it's practically the same.

Re: 12 min song discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:56 pm
by nukeboy
TomiT14 wrote:
nukeboy wrote:It would be rad if they re-recorded In Too Deep, and recorded the song like how the play it live.
Well, the only difference between the album and live versions is the intro, which is already recorded as the intro of Confusion And Frustration.

Yeah, I know it's a simple intro, and could hardly be called an intro for CAFIMT.
But whenever they played CAFIMT live they played intro for In Too Deep like it's on the album.
So that's why I'd like to call it CAFIMT intro, since it's practically the same.
They still play Confusion & Frustration live? Wow, I totally thought they ditched Underclass Hero songs.

Re: 12 min song discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:07 pm
by TomiT14
nukeboy wrote:
TomiT14 wrote:
nukeboy wrote:It would be rad if they re-recorded In Too Deep, and recorded the song like how the play it live.
Well, the only difference between the album and live versions is the intro, which is already recorded as the intro of Confusion And Frustration.

Yeah, I know it's a simple intro, and could hardly be called an intro for CAFIMT.
But whenever they played CAFIMT live they played intro for In Too Deep like it's on the album.
So that's why I'd like to call it CAFIMT intro, since it's practically the same.
They still play Confusion & Frustration live? Wow, I totally thought they ditched Underclass Hero songs.
Note "whenever the played". They've been playing In Too Deep like that since 2007.

Re: 12 min song discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:23 pm
by kILLDR3n
TomiT14 wrote:
nukeboy wrote:It would be rad if they re-recorded In Too Deep, and recorded the song like how the play it live.
Well, the only difference between the album and live versions is the intro, which is already recorded as the intro of Confusion And Frustration.

Yeah, I know it's a simple intro, and could hardly be called an intro for CAFIMT.
But whenever they played CAFIMT live they played intro for In Too Deep like it's on the album.
So that's why I'd like to call it CAFIMT intro, since it's practically the same.
They don't sound the same. The part they play live nowadays for the intro of In Too Deep is the same part that leads into the second verse.

Re: 12 min song discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:27 pm
by TomiT14
kILLDR3n wrote:
TomiT14 wrote:
nukeboy wrote:It would be rad if they re-recorded In Too Deep, and recorded the song like how the play it live.
Well, the only difference between the album and live versions is the intro, which is already recorded as the intro of Confusion And Frustration.

Yeah, I know it's a simple intro, and could hardly be called an intro for CAFIMT.
But whenever they played CAFIMT live they played intro for In Too Deep like it's on the album.
So that's why I'd like to call it CAFIMT intro, since it's practically the same.
They don't sound the same. The part they play live nowadays for the intro of In Too Deep is the same part that leads into the second verse.
Well yeah, true that, but the start of the live version of ITD is the same as the intro of CAFIMT. So, the intro of ITD live is CAFIMT intro + the start of second verse of ITD.
Still don't hear the similarity? I'm only talking about the start of the song.

Re: 12 min song discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:38 pm
by Jeremy Kill
Oh! Now I get it... it's the chicka-chicka's that are the same! :silly:

Re: 12 min song discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:47 pm
by kILLDR3n
Oh I didn't know you meant that, I thought you meant the whole riff.

Re: 12 min song discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:18 pm
by TomiT14
Jeremy Kill wrote:Oh! Now I get it... it's the chicka-chicka's that are the same! :silly:
Yeah, that's it! :glad:

Not a big deal, but since every time the CAFIMT was in the setlist, they played the album version of In Too Deep.

Just like they did with Motivation ending with 88 instrumental. Everytime 88 was in there, they either left it out from Motivation or played the Mr. Amsterdam instrumental instead.

Re: 12 min song discussion

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:30 pm
by kILLDR3n
I wish they would play 88 fully. I don't they ever have except for the one that's on Go Chuck Yourself.