Nirvana or Foo Fighters?????

AVA182b · Post by **AVA182b** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:02 am

I love them both so so so much. But i'm gonna have to go with Kurt and Dave instead of just Dave.

dearyou_182 · Post by **dearyou_182** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:14 am

Post by **Dylan** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:17 am

foo fighters have better vocals.

Biznatch · Post by **Biznatch** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 12:31 pm

both are great, but FF are better

Post by **Boni** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:03 pm

Foo Fighters are much better than Nirvana, in my eyes

budgie · Post by **budgie** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:32 pm

foo's

Gibsum 41 · Post by **Gibsum 41** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:35 pm

foo fighters

Jonny · Post by **Jonny** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:37 pm

Foo Fighters, but of course, without Nirvana there would be no foo.
Also Nirvana are great.

Post by **Druska** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:13 am

nirvana I like ff but nirvana it's my favorite band or one of my favorites

Rick · Post by **Rick** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:53 am

nirvana is overrated.

BrandonCorey · Post by **BrandonCorey** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:43 am

I said Foo Fighters but I love them both

budgie · Post by **budgie** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:09 pm

quality: foo's > nirvana

influence: nirvana >>> foo's

/thread

mattyw_rules · Post by **mattyw_rules** » Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:41 am

nirvana, nothing beats heaven

Fioro · Post by **Fioro** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 12:24 pm

Nirvana 4 Life!

HilgaMan · Post by **HilgaMan** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:08 pm

I voted for Foo Fighters. I like their music better, even though i agree that without Nirvana there wouldn't be FF....

Asho_DirtyPoo · Post by **Asho_DirtyPoo** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:15 pm

Rick. wrote:nirvana is overrated.

Agree 10 fold.

I'm much moreso a fan of the Foo Fighters than Nirvana. Their musical talent is better all the way around. Obviously Nirvana had talent, as they were able to become rock icons as they have...but it wasn't so much musical talent as it was that certain je ne sais qoui. That, and that Kurt died at exactly the right time for them to blow up and be considered icons because of it...

Post by **Jeremy Kill** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 5:46 am

I'm going with Nirvana. Lots of bands have been inspired by Nirvana's style of a mellow and a pounding chorus.

Rick · Post by **Rick** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 3:12 pm

Asho_DirtyPoo wrote:
Rick. wrote:nirvana is overrated.
Agree 10 fold.

I'm much moreso a fan of the Foo Fighters than Nirvana. Their musical talent is better all the way around. Obviously Nirvana had talent, as they were able to become rock icons as they have...but it wasn't so much musical talent as it was that certain je ne sais qoui. That, and that Kurt died at exactly the right time for them to blow up and be considered icons because of it...

i think if anyone doesn't agree with that theres something wrong with them

Janet · Post by **Janet** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 5:40 pm

I'd have to say Foo Fighters.

Spanky. · Post by **Spanky.** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 6:04 pm

Nirvana.

TheresNoSolution.com

Nirvana or Foo Fighters?????

Who Do You Like Better??

Nirvana or Foo Fighters?????